🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart nuclear talks with the United States provided that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared new appeals had originated from intermediaries to resume negotiations with the US government. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Walking a Challenging Course

Araghchi is treading a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be operating from a situation of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that ended with the US president claiming the locations had been destroyed. Following this, EU nations exercised their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Offered

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials claimed three times they had secured an understanding with the US representative the US official only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Situation

Iran's diplomats said the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the offer could be reintroduced in some form if talks reopen.

The US president recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of inactivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states diplomacy is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the conference, designed to paint the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of global regulations, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the dispute could not be resolved by military means. He said the strikes started with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust difficult to rebuild.

Dialogue Remains the Ultimate Solution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the European states that had always sought to impose their desires during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be alive and continues the ultimate resolution to address conflicts, but its criteria, rules and principles must be adhered to."

"If they address to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and respect, they will obtain a reply in the identical approach."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He stated: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but did not succeed to break. The nation of Iran have developed more resilient, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."